Return to work (RTW) and operational integration management (OIM)
The pathway from treatment to workplace reintegration
The longer an employee is absent because of illness, the more difficult it is for them to resume their work. An integrated RTW process that brings together internal and external actors helps employees make the transition back to working life in a timely and sustainable manner.
RTW stands for structures, measures and activities that enable a timely return to work after any long-term sickness absence. Ideally, this RTW process already begins while the employee is still on sickness absence and goes much further than just operational integration management (OIM). In many cases, returning with a gradual reintegration is helpful.
Twenty Years of Operational Integration Management (OIM): Increasing Coverage, But Still Room for Improvement
BIBB/BAuA-Faktenblatt 52: 20 Jahre betriebliches Eingliederungsmanagement (BEM): zunehmende Verbreitung, aber noch Luft nach obenTwo decades after the introduction of operational integration management (OIM), the 2024 Employment Survey (Erwerbstätigenbefragung) conducted by the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, BAuA) and the Federal Institute for Vocational Training (Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung, BIBB) reveals a positive trend in this field: coverage has increased, with 52 per cent of employees now having access to OIM. Yet, despite this development, there continues to be scope to expand OIM provision because about half of those entitled to benefit from it are employed in organisations where it is still not being offered. Medium-sized and large enterprises and the public sector are particularly driving ahead the delivery of OIM. Also clearly identifiable is that the implementation of OIM is being pioneered by organisations concerned with health matters. BIBB/BAuA Fact Sheet 52 (German).
Back to working life through dialogue: the individual at the heart of the RTW process
A comprehensive RTW process is centred on the returning employee. The process is a communicative dialogue between the person who has been off work, the key RTW stakeholders in the workplace, the physicians providing treatment, and any therapists who may be involved.
The main goals of a coordinated RTW process are:
more favourable health trajectories and
a sustainable return to work.
From the point of view of the returning employee, the RTW process is an essential aspect of coping with their illness. Seen from an operational point of view, it is a process of communication about the conditions for RTW and the configuration of the working environment, but also an organisational development process.
Above all, social support from colleagues and supervisors is an important factor in successful RTW.
A variety of helpful information for operational RTW practice is provided by the baua:Guidance brochure Managing RTW Together (Die Rückkehr gemeinsam gestalten) with its in-depth fact sheets.
OIM: a statutory obligation and essential element of sustainable RTW
Since 2004, German employers have been obliged to offer operational integration management to employees who have been on sick leave for extended periods. OIM is voluntary for employees and serves to preserve their workability and employability. OIM is anchored in law by Section 167 (2) of the Ninth Book of the German Social Code (Sozialgesetzbuch, SGB). This stipulates that an employer has to offer OIM to all employees who are unable to work for more than six weeks, either consecutively or due to several absences, in the course of a year. Many organisations have some catching-up to do in this regard. Although employers have a statutory duty to offer OIM, it is only offered to approximately half of all the employees who are potentially entitled to it. However, the take-up rate is almost 70%, which shows there is demand for it among workers (cf. BIBB/BAuA Fact Sheet 52: Twenty Years of Operational Integration Management (OIM): Increasing Coverage but Still Room for Improvement (20 Jahre betriebliches Eingliederungsmanagement (BEM): zunehmende Verbreitung, aber noch Luft nach oben)).
OIM as a systemic process
Operational integration management stands for individual case management, as well as the development of teams and organisations. OIM aims to maintain good health and the best possible work ability. It helps those concerned to
overcome an existing work incapacity,
prevent a renewed work incapacity, and
maintain and enhance work ability over the long term.
Systemic OIM operates at four levels of work ability:
at the medical level with a focus on the maintenance of performance,
at the mental level with a focus on motivation and self-efficacy,
at the social level with a focus on support from professional helpers, supervisors, and colleagues, and
at the organisational level with a focus on the development of support structures and the adaptation of work requirements and/or conditions.
In addition, an appropriately organised OIM process makes it possible to link up early diagnosis and rehabilitation, in particular when support from inside (and outside) the organisation is arranged at an early stage for individuals who suffer work incapacity repeatedly. Apart from this, the experience that is gained from implementing OIM can be drawn on to help prevent chronic diseases.
The OIM process
A systematic approach is recommended if operational integration management is to be implemented successfully. The following steps need to be considered in this context:
Typical OIM procedure
Identification of incapacity for work > six weeks within the last twelve months
Letter with invitation to initial interview
OIM consultations
Implementation of interventions
Final consultation and reflection
Optional sustainability consultation
The four-phase reintegration model – a systemic and systematic approach
The four-phase reintegration model was developed for the RTW process following mental health crises, but is also a source of good suggestions for other situations. It forms a clearly structured process for sustainable reintegration into the workplace. The first two phases prepare the RTW process. Phase 1 (co-orientation) involves building up a trusting working relationship and solution-oriented dialogue about the interventions and resources necessary for the employee’s forthcoming RTW. Phase 2 (coordination) is concerned with the organisational preparation and coordination of these interventions. The remaining phases deal with the RTW process and the implementation of the interventions that have been prepared. Phase 3 (cooperation) covers the employee’s return and the ongoing review and adaptation of interventions and resources during RTW. Phase 4 (renewed co-orientation) concentrates on how to sustainably secure the employee’s performance and work ability.
Further helpful information for workplace practice is provided by the baua: Guidance brochure Managing RTW Together (Die Rückkehr gemeinsam gestalten)(German).
Returning to work after sickness absence due to common mental disorders: study design and baseline findings from an 18 months mixed methods follow-up study in Germany
Project numberF 2525StatusOngoing Project
Formative qualitative evaluation of an early intervention at the workplace (FRIAA) for employees with common mental disorders
Project numberF 2516StatusCompleted Project
Stigmatization associated with SARS-CoV-2 in the occupational setting: Summary of the state of knowledge and interview study
Project numberF 2367StatusCompleted Project
Scoping Review on determinants for a successful return-to-work and systematic overview on interventions to facilitate return to work among employees with mental disorders
Project numberF 2385StatusCompleted Project
Determinants of a successful return to work among persons with common mental disorders: a mixed-methods-follow-up-study (Project 2a)
Project numberF 2386StatusCompleted Project
Mental illness in the working environment and return to work: Mixed methods follow-up study on the determinants for a successful Return to Work from the employees' perspective (project 2b - qualitative part) - results of the qualitative sub-study
Project numberF 2397StatusCompleted Project
Determinants of a successful return to work among persons with common mental disorders: Evaluation of a psychosomatic consultation in the workplace in Lower Saxony (Project 3)
Project numberF 2414StatusCompleted Project
Returning to work after mental health problems: cooperation and alliances between healthcare institutions and companies in the return to work process
Project numberF 2319StatusCompleted Project
Communicative Action as a factor in the return-to-work-process from the perspective of return-to-work coordinators - A qualitative study for development of a best practice guide